This week's
Booking Through Thursday asks the following question:
“What’s the worst ‘best’ book you’ve ever read — the one everyone says is so great, but you can’t figure out why?”
Well, I feel somewhat like a broken record here but the worst book I think I have ever read is
The Shack. (You can see
my review of The Shack here.) I know so very many people think that it's just wonderful but in my opinion it is theologically unsound. It has just enough things in it that appear to be true to be distracting. I really dislike books that I feel do not offer a firm foundation but that are able to sway people's emotions so wildly in any given direction. This is not the type of book that I feel generally charitable towards.
My ability to become riled over a bad piece of fiction and to come to the conclusion that something is just flat out awful depends most on what kind of theology is presented in the book. In my opinion, books have the ability to express a great deal of thought and are good tools for explaining someone's world view. I'm not going to care so very much if some one's world view is "benign" in the sense that the chances of one particular author being able to sway the masses are concerned. If an author is expressing a belief or opinion about the very nature of who God is, and if people are likely to be influenced by that thought, then I'm probably not going to like the book, unless the author's opinion is firmly entrenched in scripture. Accuracy on that particular subject is extremely important.
I would say that I would probably care about an author's opinion if it came to a social issue that had the ability to really change society. A
good example of a book that was able to change society is
Uncle Tom's Cabin
. Abraham Lincoln, upon meeting Harriet Beacher Stowe, is reported as saying that this was the lady who managed to start the (civil) war. Books have power and I firmly believe that! So I'm going to naturally care about the message that they are communicating as I think anyone should. People read. People think. People act.
I'm going to tolerate/ignore/not mind any book that deals with policies that I don't think are detrimental but perhaps a bit unwise or not very well thought out. I'm going to loathe any book that suggests that something evil is really very good, or any book that says God isn't what He said He is.
This was an interesting question and it is helping me to clarify what I like and don't like about certain books. Obviously, I'm hashing this out for myself as I type. Still learning. Still thinking.