
Well, to be honest, I wasn't all together impressed with
By Design
:
God's Distinctive Calling for Women, by Susan Hunt. I think this is the second or third time I've approached something by Hunt and had some difficulty. Her manner of expressing herself just doesn't jive very well with me and I struggled through the book as a result. That, even though I was prepared to like it and agree with it whole heartedly.
The argument in this book is that men and women were created differently and are designed by God to do different things. Hunt does not believe that men are superior to women, but that they do have a different role to play in life than women do. In all of this, I agree with her. Her argument is that women were designed to be helpers and she goes on to define and describe her view of Biblical womanhood through scriptures and various examples. She makes her point but it's hard for me to conclude the she makes her point well because I just don't connect to the way she goes about attempting to clarify what Biblical womenhood should ultimately look like and/or be.
The main point she stresses is that women are to be helpers. By this she means that we are designed by God to be nurturers and to feel emotions and have more compassion than men. In this way, she says, we are able to hear and see needs when men frequently overlook such things. Because women are designed to be more emotional, they have compassionate hearts that wish to reach out to the poor, the lost, the needy and the weak among us. The whole of her book is filled with example after example of women who heard about or witnessed needs and then went about working to fulfill the described need.
I see what Hunt is trying to do by arguing in this manner and I agree with her basic points. But as she pointed out so clearly, women are much more emotional than men. And this book came off as an emotional plea to use emotions to work in the home, church and society at large to bring about change. Again, I see her point and I rather agree with it. However, as I read through it I kept thinking about how a few specific people I know would react to reading this and I think that Hunt would have a terribly hard time getting through to them to argue herself out. Mostly because she doesn't really "argue" or present factual information.
For instance, she tries to make one of her points but using the game of chess as an example. To begin making her point, she says, "Now, I don't play chess but a friend told me..." (Given that I married into a chess playing family, I rolled my eyes at this example and wished she had decided to relate what she was trying to say to something that was familiar to her. That old adage about "writing about that which you know" was running through my brain as I read on.) Hunt also stated at one point: "my unscientific observation is that..." which made me want to shut the book, quite honestly.
Due to the fact that she discredited herself and her observations so many times (albeit unintentionally), it made it hard for me to want to read it or to even talk about it online. Why? Because I agree with her that society has a serious problem when it comes to defining and supporting the individual (and different) roles of men and women. I do believe that the feminist movement of the 1960's was detrimental to the family and the home in many ways. That said (and this is an In All Honesty Post) I don't know that I can articulate my reasons why I believe that the church, primarily, and society, secondarily, needs to acknowledge that men and women were created to be different. I do believe that men were called to be leaders and women were called to be their helpers. I do not believe women are dumb, are supposed to be silent on all issues at all times and are lesser than the males. I believe that they are designed to compliment the men and do great things in their own right. I have a multitude of thoughts all jumbled up in my head about this which I'm working on ironing out and thinking through so that I can better articulate my belief system. Therefore I am on the lookout for books which helpfully spell out the arguments a bit so that I can work through my own thoughts in an orderly way.
Towards the end of last year I started reading
Countering the Claims of Evangelical Feminism: Biblical Responses to the Key Questions
, by Wayne Grudem. I interrupted the read to finish up some other books but I really ought to go back to it because in it Grudem lays out a Biblical argument in a clear, concise manner which is easy to understand and make sense of. It is far more academic than Hunt's book and has the ability to argue bad theology out of you. (This is more what I am looking for.)
I would say that
By Design
is a call to action to women who are in the church and believe that they have a unique design and purpose in conjunction with men. If you agree with Hunt already, there are a few things in this book to be encouraged by. But if you don't agree with her, or if you are sorting through your thoughts in order to better articulate them, you will likely find this book lacking. It feels more like it is "preaching to the choir" -- which I am a part of -- with a little too much song and dance and not enough thoughtful, Biblical argument.
It's definitely back to Grudem for me!