Guest post by JonathanI'm here today with some thoughts on the book
Why Johnny Can't Sing Hymns: How Pop Culture Rewrote the Hymnal, by T. David Gordon. As you probably know, occasionally Carrie will receive complimentary copies of new releases by some publishing houses, and I saw this one arrive and snatched it up!
This particular subject is near and dear to my heart, having originally been trained as a classical pianist, and then participating on church worship teams over the last 10+ years. Churches we have been involved in have run the gamut of worship styles, from Sunday-morning services matching Christian radio's countdown of hits, to environments where "How Great Thou Art" would be considered
contemporary worship music.
Of course, just like everybody else, there are particular styles of music that I feel most comfortable and "at home" with. If you pop open the CD player in my car, you'll recognize at a glance the music I enjoy the most. And, yes, Carrie and I have quite different tastes in this area! But that's just fine with me, and you're welcome to your own musical styles also. I am A-OK with diversity when it comes to music preferences.
That was always the philosophy that I approached corporate worship with, as well. Particular churches found their musical identity in one form or another for Sunday morning services, and that was fine with me -- after all, who am I to judge? And, more specifically, who is T. David Gordon to judge?! So, I was eager to read through this book. (A process which still took me about 100x as much time as Carrie seems to be able to read books in, but whatever! It's not like a competition or anything. Right, honey?)
So, having just finished it up, I have a ton of thoughts flying through my mind that I will try to articulate. First of all, from the perspective of being a well-written, thought-provoking, scripturally-based treatise on music and worship in the church, this book is an ace in the hole. But what's more important than the presentation in my mind are specifically the arguments made.
Let's start out with some fundamentals.
Why do we, as a congregation of believers on any given Sunday morning, express worship in the form of music, at all? Well,
because it is a God-ordained method of doing so, solidly endorsed throughout scripture. (Start with the book of Psalms and work your way in either direction.) We can certainly express worship individually through a variety of art forms, but singing has the distinction of being a corporate activity, with participation by young and old.
So, then,
what is our goal in singing songs of worship corporately? Based on the examples of scripture,
to declare God's glory, righteousness, mercy, and grace. Any other motivation should absolutely be swept off the table. This is where it gets uncomfortable. There is absolutely no scriptural basis for worship songs which are written to:
- Make us feel good
- Draw unbelievers to Christ
- Adopt popular styles to minimize "uncomfortable" differences between the church's culture and the world's culture
Where does this leave us? Quite simply, we don't get to decide what makes a particular song more or less suitable for corporate worship based on our personal musical preferences; we have to evaluate the song based on how effectively it serves the purpose of ascribing glory to God.
Incredible attention to detail was given by the hymn selection committees of earlier years, who chose which songs to include (or exclude) when compiling hymnals. At least half a dozen criteria were used to determine if each hymn was suitable for corporate worship, considering the music and lyrics in great detail. But, in an amazing number of churches today, that type of thoughtful process has been thrown out the window and replaced by the simple requirement, "Does its musical style match what our church likes to play and listen to?"
The author does not claim that 100% of all contemporary worship music should be discarded without a second glance. He (and I) agree that there are some recent worship choruses to be found which have every quality necessary for corporate worship. However, he does argue that these specimens are few and far between, and that we, as thinking Christians, should be using our brains to evaluate a little more carefully the music we're using to worship God.
One example that comes to my mind is a song by Mark Schultz which seems to be stuck on "repeat" on most Christian radio stations lately. Here are some of its lyrics, which, by the way, score a 100% on the "tuneful chorus which will get stuck in your head" meter:
Every knee shall bow,
Every tongue confess,
That God is love
And love has come for us allWhat an incredible distortion of the gospel! This kind of phrasing, while you might be able to argue
could be interpreted in a way which technically resembles the truth, is rife with ambiguity. Following the "Every knee shall bow, every tongue confess" phrase (which absolutely comes from scripture, but in a
totally different context) we run into statements which sound like to the average Joe like God loves him and is coming for him regardless of any particular faith or action on his part. How comforting!
Not. Universalism deserves no more place in Christianity now than ever, and this kind of drivel should be never be allowed into our radio stations or churches.
Anyway, where was I? Oh, yes, getting off the soapbox now.
So, as I was saying, the primary emphasis of this book is to make you think about the way you use music to express worship. I believe that we should all, as Christians, be doing more of this. T. David Gordon has done quite a lot of research and presents some interesting facts and arguments. (And, along the way, debunks the myth that Martin Luther set hymn lyrics to bar tunes.) If this topic sparks your interest in any way, check out his book. If it doesn't... well, maybe my next post will be sharing a casserole recipe. Right.